Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Is there a possibility that our strive towards accuracy is actually counterproductive to musical engagement/enjoyment?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JonnyP" data-source="post: 1140330" data-attributes="member: 17918"><p>True to source indeed, but, it was effectively a pre-arranged (as in tested to get the best result) live recording with most tracks requiring a few takes. Doesn’t count as mixing but to an extent it was a ‘pre-mix’. What you hear is what you get. The same can be said for some live albums (although many are later re-mixed).</p><p></p><p>The effect in this case is a very good ‘live with no audience’ album. In a similar vein are a few of the MTV unplugged sessions which went out live so no later mixing or overdubs (on a VHS tape from the TV). I guess what I’m trying to say (as with my posts above), is that what matters more than ‘perfect reproduction via your kit’ (which will never sound the same as being in the studio) is whether the music released realises what the musician wanted it to. In the case of TS, most certainly, regardless of whether it is on a Walkman, a streamer with thousands of dollars spent, or on my humble system. All convey the spirit of the recording and intention of the band. As do the albums mentioned above. Even a Wolf Eyes CD can do that (although beware of the intent conveyed)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JonnyP, post: 1140330, member: 17918"] True to source indeed, but, it was effectively a pre-arranged (as in tested to get the best result) live recording with most tracks requiring a few takes. Doesn’t count as mixing but to an extent it was a ‘pre-mix’. What you hear is what you get. The same can be said for some live albums (although many are later re-mixed). The effect in this case is a very good ‘live with no audience’ album. In a similar vein are a few of the MTV unplugged sessions which went out live so no later mixing or overdubs (on a VHS tape from the TV). I guess what I’m trying to say (as with my posts above), is that what matters more than ‘perfect reproduction via your kit’ (which will never sound the same as being in the studio) is whether the music released realises what the musician wanted it to. In the case of TS, most certainly, regardless of whether it is on a Walkman, a streamer with thousands of dollars spent, or on my humble system. All convey the spirit of the recording and intention of the band. As do the albums mentioned above. Even a Wolf Eyes CD can do that (although beware of the intent conveyed) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
Is there a possibility that our strive towards accuracy is actually counterproductive to musical engagement/enjoyment?
Top