Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
MusicCast - Tidal FLAC fully resolved
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tonteldoos" data-source="post: 1188979" data-attributes="member: 689"><p>It is technically possible for the 5Ghz wifi to be faster and better optimised than 100Mbps ethernet, but it is not universally likely to be better for all users.</p><p></p><p>5Ghz offers its benefits only over shorter distances, so unless the AVR is close to the router, it’s better to use 2.4Ghz or ethernet.</p><p></p><p>Ethernet is also still likely to offer lower latency, so given a fast internet connection there shouldn’t be much difference. If anything, ethernet should still be the more stable choice.</p><p></p><p>Also, at risk of stating the obvious, you are of course still limited by the line speed and the primary router. (I.e. gigabit port on the device can still only go as fast as the smallest bottleneck higher in the chain).</p><p></p><p>I also find that (Apple phones to Marantz and other devices) that higher res Tidal can be a bit finicky sometimes, so I think it’s more likely a Tidal problem.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tonteldoos, post: 1188979, member: 689"] It is technically possible for the 5Ghz wifi to be faster and better optimised than 100Mbps ethernet, but it is not universally likely to be better for all users. 5Ghz offers its benefits only over shorter distances, so unless the AVR is close to the router, it’s better to use 2.4Ghz or ethernet. Ethernet is also still likely to offer lower latency, so given a fast internet connection there shouldn’t be much difference. If anything, ethernet should still be the more stable choice. Also, at risk of stating the obvious, you are of course still limited by the line speed and the primary router. (I.e. gigabit port on the device can still only go as fast as the smallest bottleneck higher in the chain). I also find that (Apple phones to Marantz and other devices) that higher res Tidal can be a bit finicky sometimes, so I think it’s more likely a Tidal problem. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
MusicCast - Tidal FLAC fully resolved
Top