Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
REW Measurements of AlleyCat's Room- Take 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="user 15182" data-source="post: 1173256" data-attributes="member: 15182"><p>I agree, and therein lies the risk of interpreting the Klippel results in an absolute manner(as it is often done)</p><p></p><p>Ok, I understand and therefore, there is no relevance to the graphs previously shared. It is your room and your user case N=1</p><p></p><p>I was indicating that low and high frequencies, because of their wavelength differences would work differently in terms of floor reflections. With longer wavelengths, the reflection interactions become less predictable to extrapolate, whereas with shorter wavelengths, the model becomes predictions become more accurate.</p><p></p><p>Once again your user case and therefore not to be generalised to someone that for example sits 3m away and doesn't use a sub with a cross-over point at 150Hz</p><p></p><p>This is perhaps the essence of my concerns with the absolutism promoted by Erin and his peers.</p><p></p><p>Let's poll who has an ideal room. For those, and only for those with ideal rooms, the Klippel results and interpretations based on it are accurate, and the more we find ourselves in the real world, the more complex and unpredictable the dynamics get.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="user 15182, post: 1173256, member: 15182"] I agree, and therein lies the risk of interpreting the Klippel results in an absolute manner(as it is often done) Ok, I understand and therefore, there is no relevance to the graphs previously shared. It is your room and your user case N=1 I was indicating that low and high frequencies, because of their wavelength differences would work differently in terms of floor reflections. With longer wavelengths, the reflection interactions become less predictable to extrapolate, whereas with shorter wavelengths, the model becomes predictions become more accurate. Once again your user case and therefore not to be generalised to someone that for example sits 3m away and doesn't use a sub with a cross-over point at 150Hz This is perhaps the essence of my concerns with the absolutism promoted by Erin and his peers. Let's poll who has an ideal room. For those, and only for those with ideal rooms, the Klippel results and interpretations based on it are accurate, and the more we find ourselves in the real world, the more complex and unpredictable the dynamics get. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
REW Measurements of AlleyCat's Room- Take 2
Top