Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Registered members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
REW Measurements of AlleyCat's Room- Take 2
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="KenMasters" data-source="post: 1173273" data-attributes="member: 517"><p>The only way I can fathom what you've written above is that you do not understand.</p><p></p><p>If your in-room response deviates dramatically from the predicted response, your issue is not with the measurement but with the room.</p><p></p><p>This is how my LS50 Metas measure up to the predicted response on Erin's page:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]40835[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>This measurement is useful because it gives me insight into what can be attributed to my room and what to my speakers, which helps me when it comes to EQ and crossover. The early drop-off is due to me bunging the LS50s and a cancellation centered around 100Hz, which is more successfully navigated by my subs:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH]40836[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>Also interesting to note the room effects echoed across sub and speaker response traces.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Indeed, which is exactly why measurements are so useful.</p><p></p><p>The Klippel is only one piece of the puzzle - when reviewing a speaker one can only speak to the performance of that speaker. An educated consumer will understand what those measurements imply for their listening space.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>But you are not considering the complex interactions, you are wilfully ignoring them, using as cover a useful (but misunderstood) data point to reject the totality. You are being what you claim to reject.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="KenMasters, post: 1173273, member: 517"] The only way I can fathom what you've written above is that you do not understand. If your in-room response deviates dramatically from the predicted response, your issue is not with the measurement but with the room. This is how my LS50 Metas measure up to the predicted response on Erin's page: [ATTACH alt="LS 50.png"]40835[/ATTACH] This measurement is useful because it gives me insight into what can be attributed to my room and what to my speakers, which helps me when it comes to EQ and crossover. The early drop-off is due to me bunging the LS50s and a cancellation centered around 100Hz, which is more successfully navigated by my subs: [ATTACH alt="Subs.png"]40836[/ATTACH] Also interesting to note the room effects echoed across sub and speaker response traces. Indeed, which is exactly why measurements are so useful. The Klippel is only one piece of the puzzle - when reviewing a speaker one can only speak to the performance of that speaker. An educated consumer will understand what those measurements imply for their listening space. But you are not considering the complex interactions, you are wilfully ignoring them, using as cover a useful (but misunderstood) data point to reject the totality. You are being what you claim to reject. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
REW Measurements of AlleyCat's Room- Take 2
Top