Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
WAV vs FLAC Study
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="PaganMcLoud" data-source="post: 700602" data-attributes="member: 17169"><p>So you're asserting that a 16bit 44.1 819kbps file has the same CPU load as a 24/96bit 4855kbps file and somehow <em>"my"</em> logic is flawed? </p><p></p><p>*Perhaps trying comparing playback of a 480p video and then a 1080p one, and see if your task manager reports the same usage.</p><p>Just as in audio... they both differ in bitrate so this would be a fair comparison methinks.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="PaganMcLoud, post: 700602, member: 17169"] So you're asserting that a 16bit 44.1 819kbps file has the same CPU load as a 24/96bit 4855kbps file and somehow [i]"my"[/i] logic is flawed? *Perhaps trying comparing playback of a 480p video and then a 1080p one, and see if your task manager reports the same usage. Just as in audio... they both differ in bitrate so this would be a fair comparison methinks. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
WAV vs FLAC Study
Top
