Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
What comes first - the source or the speaker?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="achim" data-source="post: 1188021" data-attributes="member: 14383"><p>I would consider your Purifi as a very good amp among many other very good amps (which measuring very well..as well).</p><p>Purifi is a very Innovation driven company - as you may only find in Denmark in these days - this alone tells me there are many improvements to make - still - and this after around 100 years of fiddling with tiny electronic signals and ways and waves we re moving air to hear and feel good. So much efforts, so much money which goes into R&D to make "things" better - and they at Purifi (and Audio Group Denmark, Gryphon etc) doing it to achieve better sound. So obviously there is headroom for achievments like this - and in my terms I would call this achievment "better sound". No serious Manufactura of Amplifiers can afford to lose their credibility by coming out with a pure, poor romantic sound - totally ignoring the basics of what the goals are here. But there are other fields - noise, interferences, resonances, from the chosen materials of the cabinets of an amp .....not discussing cables....up to the speakers which "having their own lifes" and partial oscillations and so on. By the way a very interesting field where Peter Lyngdorf is very much ahead of our times. This explains next to the "big steps" in making better (sounding) amps why the world is using different materials for their surroundings, membranes, baskets and so on...... as a dansk I am sure you knowing all that <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite1" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="achim, post: 1188021, member: 14383"] I would consider your Purifi as a very good amp among many other very good amps (which measuring very well..as well). Purifi is a very Innovation driven company - as you may only find in Denmark in these days - this alone tells me there are many improvements to make - still - and this after around 100 years of fiddling with tiny electronic signals and ways and waves we re moving air to hear and feel good. So much efforts, so much money which goes into R&D to make "things" better - and they at Purifi (and Audio Group Denmark, Gryphon etc) doing it to achieve better sound. So obviously there is headroom for achievments like this - and in my terms I would call this achievment "better sound". No serious Manufactura of Amplifiers can afford to lose their credibility by coming out with a pure, poor romantic sound - totally ignoring the basics of what the goals are here. But there are other fields - noise, interferences, resonances, from the chosen materials of the cabinets of an amp .....not discussing cables....up to the speakers which "having their own lifes" and partial oscillations and so on. By the way a very interesting field where Peter Lyngdorf is very much ahead of our times. This explains next to the "big steps" in making better (sounding) amps why the world is using different materials for their surroundings, membranes, baskets and so on...... as a dansk I am sure you knowing all that :-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
What comes first - the source or the speaker?
Top