Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Members
Current visitors
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
What comes first - the source or the speaker?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Help Support AVForums:
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tzs503gp" data-source="post: 1190081" data-attributes="member: 19443"><p>Can YOU track an animal in the Kalahari bush? Or in a tropical forest?</p><p>There are people that can do that.</p><p>Can you spot a fake Van Gogh over the real thing?</p><p>There are people that can do that.</p><p>Your senses work just as well as those peoples senses, so why can’t you do what they can do?</p><p></p><p>The difference is training. Those trackers and authenticators are trained to spot deviations from known conditions. Aptitude is a significant factor in the determination of such peoples efficacy. </p><p>A well practiced listener can hear differences in equipment <strong>where they exist</strong> to a certain degree. Just because you and any number of others can’t hear these differences does not mean they don’t exist.</p><p></p><p>That said, I concur that the placebo effect is very real and powerful regarding equipment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tzs503gp, post: 1190081, member: 19443"] Can YOU track an animal in the Kalahari bush? Or in a tropical forest? There are people that can do that. Can you spot a fake Van Gogh over the real thing? There are people that can do that. Your senses work just as well as those peoples senses, so why can’t you do what they can do? The difference is training. Those trackers and authenticators are trained to spot deviations from known conditions. Aptitude is a significant factor in the determination of such peoples efficacy. A well practiced listener can hear differences in equipment [B]where they exist[/B] to a certain degree. Just because you and any number of others can’t hear these differences does not mean they don’t exist. That said, I concur that the placebo effect is very real and powerful regarding equipment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Audio and Video Talk
General Discussion
What comes first - the source or the speaker?
Top
